Best Prop Firms for European Traders in 2026 can choose from many good prop firms also with varied funding methods, platforms, and profit sharing models. FTMO, FundedNext, and The5%ers are reputable prop firms with great evaluative moats and scalable capital, while newer prop firms like BrightFunded and E8 Markets possess strong tech and good payout speed.
Different prop firms suit different traders. Evaluative moats from challenge models, trustworthy profit splits, and high payout are the best factors prop traders can place in 2026 for high potential, consistent, professional growth in trading.
Key Point
1️⃣ FTMO – Well-established industry leader with a structured two-phase challenge and up to ~90% profit splits.
2️⃣ FundedNext – Fast-growing prop firm known for flexible evaluations and high profit shares.
3️⃣ The5%ers – Offers scaling growth programs with potential for high capital increases and up to 100% profit split.
4️⃣ Alpha Capital – Trader-friendly firm with competitive profit splits and solid overall ratings.
5️⃣ E8 Markets – Modern prop firm with tech-driven platform, clear rules, and fast payouts.
6️⃣ Funding Pips – Highly rated for transparent rules, fast payouts, and consistent trader feedback.
7️⃣ BrightFunded – Boutique prop firm offering strong profit shares and scaling potential.
8️⃣ City Traders Imperium – UK-based firm with multiple challenge types and up to 100% profit share.
9️⃣ The Trading Pit – Growing European prop firm with reliable conditions and good trader reviews.
🔟 Topstep – Futures-focused prop firm with systematic evaluation and funded accounts upon passing the Trading Combine.
10 Best Prop Firms for European Traders In 2026
1. FTMO
FTMO – With a reputation for being the Czech Republic’s and Europe’s leading prop firm for traders, FTMO has a fully developed two-step challenge, in which traders are evaluated based on specific profit target achievements and drawdown constraints.

Once funding is secured, a profit share of 80-90% is common, and payouts are made bi-weekly. Most traders receive their payout requests in 1-2 business days.
FTMO has the longest track record and most transparent rules. They cover a good range of assets, including crypto, on cTrader and the top limited platforms MT4 and MT5.
FTMO
• Structure Evaluation: Two-phase Challenge + Verification with specific profit targets.
• Profit Splits: Up to ~80–90%.
• Platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade.
• Payouts: Bi-weekly with proven history.
• Scaling: Capital increments up to high six figures with a scaling plan.
• Risk Rules: Daily & max drawdowns set clearly for consistency.
FTMO
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Well-established and trusted globally. | Two-step evaluation can be stressful for beginners. |
| High profit split up to 90%. | Challenge fees are relatively high. |
| Wide range of assets: Forex, indices, commodities, crypto. | Strict daily & max drawdown rules. |
| Multiple platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader. | Limited support for automated trading strategies in some accounts. |
| Scaling plan allows account growth up to high capital. | Payouts are bi-weekly, not instant. |
2. FundedNext
FundedNext has been noted in Europe for their rapidly growing popularity, originally being based in the UAE. They now have highly flexible evaluations and cover a range of trading styles, including one-step and two-step challenges.

They also have the highest profit share in the industry, which is split 95% on Contracts for Difference (CFDs) and 100% on contracts for futures. Their payout requests even have the industry’s highest rate, which is 24 hours.
Having no time limits for challenges and transparent risk rules is a huge plus for FundedNext. They combine flexible challenge models and strong payouts making them the best pick for active traders.
FundedNext
• Flexibility: One step, two step, & instant funding options.
• Profit Splits: About 80–95% depending on your plan.
• Platforms: MT4, MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader (plus futures options).
• Payouts: Super quick — Generally weekly or within ~24-48 hrs.
• No Time Limit: Traders can finish the challenges whenever they like.
FundedNext
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Flexible evaluation: 1-step, 2-step, instant funding. | Newer firm; long-term reputation not as strong. |
| Very fast payouts, often within 24 hours. | Rules can be complex depending on program. |
| Supports MT4, MT5, cTrader, and futures platforms. | Limited community forums compared to FTMO. |
| High profit share: up to 95%. | Occasional platform latency reported by traders. |
| Allows traders to complete challenges at own pace. | Customer support response can vary. |
3. The5%ers
The5%ers – With multi-stage challenges and instant 44funding programs The5%ers is a growth prop firm. Starting profit splits are at 50%, and then go up to 100% after steady performance. The5%ers is MT5 supported and works with forex and metals.

The5%ers is good for traders who want to long-term scale. Challenges are structured with risk concerns such as max drawdown limits.
Funded traders can get payouts bi-weekly or monthly. The5%ers most attrcts disciplined traders because of the emphasis on real funding and progressive profit shares.
The5%ers
• Selectivity: Instant, one-phase & multi-phase programs for growth.
• Profit Splits: Vary up to ~100% on higher tiers.
• Platforms: MT5 with quick execution.
• Focus: Beginner traders with transparent guidelines and lower challenge amounts.
• Scaling: Capital growth as performance improves.
The5%ers
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong scaling programs; funded accounts grow with performance. | Initial profit split lower (50–70%) before scaling. |
| Flexible evaluation timing; no strict deadlines. | Payouts are slower (monthly). |
| Focused on long-term trader consistency. | Only supports MT5 and Forex/Metals primarily. |
| Offers educational resources and mentoring. | Smaller starting capital compared to some competitors. |
| Good for European traders seeking stable growth. | Trading style restrictions on certain programs. |
4. Alpha Capital
Alpha Capital – With a profit split of up to 80-85% and a two-step challenge, Alpha Capital is a good choice for traders who like professional-grade tools. They also support cTrader, DXtrade and MT for everything.

They want traders to be good at risk management and consistency before they award funding. Payouts are prop firm standard and everything is straightforward with the rules and payouts.
The company’s reputation and international trader base make it a safe choice for Europeans prioritizing dependability and robust support.
Alpha Capital
• Evaluation Time: Take as long as needed to finish the challenges.
• Profit split: Competitive and top-split profit sharing (often ~80-85%).
• Platforms: MT5, cTrader, and other professional platforms.
• Low commissions: Zero/low commission structures to drive net profit enhancements.
• Trader support: Good support and infrastructure focus.
Alpha Capital
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Simple evaluation process, beginner-friendly. | Mixed trust/review scores from traders. |
| On-demand payouts possible. | Smaller global presence than FTMO/FundedNext. |
| Platforms: MT5, cTrader, DXtrade. | Limited multi-asset access. |
| Competitive profit split (~80–85%). | Less community and forum engagement. |
| Transparent fee structure. | Some users report slightly slower account approval. |
5. E8 Markets
E8 Markets differentiates itself through its contemporary tech stack and adaptable evaluation features such as one or two-step challenges. Profit splits are in the range of 80–90% and payouts occur biweekly after you are funded.

Traders can use MT5, cTrader, and MatchTrader and are able to conduct trading of forex, indices, and crypto. Drawdown limits are clear, and the trading conditions are superior and include tight spreads.
E8’s technology-centric trading dashboard, and relatively flexible evaluation criteria have made it particularly appealing to novice tech-savvy traders in Europe.
E8 Markets
• High tech platforms: Modern technology with simplicity multiplies efficiency
• Profit split: Up to ~80-100% depending on program.
• Platforms: MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader.
• Large capital access: Funding can grow to quite large account sizes.
• Payouts: Once funded, fast and clear.
E8 Markets
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Modern tech stack and intuitive dashboards. | Newer firm; less established reputation. |
| Fast payouts with clear rules. | Limited historical track record. |
| Profit split up to 100% in advanced programs. | Small trader community; limited peer support. |
| Supports MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader. | Fewer educational resources compared to FTMO/The5%ers. |
| Broad asset coverage: Forex, indices, crypto. | Customer support occasionally slow during peak hours. |
6. Funding Pips
Funding Pips offers a direct one or two-phase challenge structure with profit splits scaling to almost 95% after meeting the specified consistency and performance criteria.

The company is compatible with cTrader and MatchTrader and their significant and reliable payout are often commented on. The risk management strategies, including daily and overall loss limits are always stated clearly to traders before joining.
Funding Pips Transparent policies, high splits, and prompt support have gotten positive reception from the community. Pips is especially appreciated by Europeans for its easy and reliable payment methods.
Funding Pips
• Simple challenge structure: One- or two- phase evaluations with clear objectives.
• Profit split: Up to ~95-100% as traders scale, plus
• Platforms: cTrader, MatchTrader, TradLocker, etc.
• Fast payouts:** A lot of traders appreciate the payment cycles.
• User-friendly rules: Risk rules are generally clear, no hidden traps.
Funding Pips
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Straightforward challenge structure. | Limited platforms: mainly MT5. |
| High profit split: 80–95%. | No demo accounts for some plans. |
| Fast payout cycle and reliable payments. | Leverage restrictions on some accounts. |
| Clear, transparent rules. | Smaller starting capital compared to other top firms. |
| Affordable evaluation fees. | Fewer advanced analytics tools than FTMO/E8 Markets. |
7. BrightFunded
The rapidly expanding prop firm BrightFunded offers up to 100% profit splits and employs a two-phase evaluation structure which includes profit targets and limits on drawdown. Available on MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade, she covers forex, indices, and other markets.

Traders appreciate clear challenge structures, especially for drawdown. Community feedback is positive, mentioning consistency and flexibility in payouts. BrightFunded is quickly becoming a favorite to European traders.
BrightFunded
• Generous profit shares: Up to ~80-90% profit share.
• Platforms: MT5 with 24/7 support and seamless onboarding.
• Unlimited challenge time: No timers on evaluations.
• Clear risk limits: Predetermined daily & total drawdown limits.
BrightFunded: Timely payout; supportive.
BrightFunded
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very generous profit shares (up to 100%). | Higher fees on some challenge programs. |
| Transparent rules and quick payouts. | Less established than FTMO/FundedNext. |
| Platforms: MT5 with user-friendly interface. | Limited global presence; mainly EU-focused. |
| Flexible evaluation: no strict time limits. | Limited asset coverage compared to FTMO. |
| Scalable funded accounts. | Smaller community support and forums. |
8. City Traders Imperium (CTI)
City Traders Imperium (CTI) has various types of challenges, including one-step, two-step, and instant funding. Profit splits are in the 70% – 80% range depending on the program and scaling. The firm is flexible in which platforms she allows, with MT4 and MT5 being the most standard.

They concentrates on forex and crypto, with clear rules outlining drawdown and evaluations. CTI’s challenges are low-cost, and traders receive profit payouts on a regular schedule.
European traders can appreciate responsive support, and simple dashboards, earning them positive reviews.
City Traders Imperium (CTI)
- Varied types of challenges: 1-Step, 2-Step, or Instant funding options.
- Profit split: Up to 100% on some tracks.
- Platforms: Available on MetaTrader & MatchTrader.
- No news restrictions: Traders can maintain positions during news spreads and over the weekend.
- Rapid scaling and payouts: Scaling to higher tiers and payouts within ~24 hours.
City Traders Imperium (CTI)
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Multiple funding options: 1-step, 2-step, instant. | No crypto trading options on some plans. |
| Fast payouts, sometimes same-day. | Fees slightly higher than average. |
| Community support & Discord mentorship. | Drawdown limits can feel restrictive. |
| Profit splits up to 100%. | Limited platform options compared to FTMO/FundedNext. |
| Good educational content for new traders. | Weekend trading not always supported. |
9. The Trading Pit
Based in Liechtenstein, The Trading Pit offers funded accounts after challenge-based evaluations with profit split tiers up to 80%. They provide MT4, MT5, and other advanced platform support to trade forex, CFDs, and futures among other assets.

Traders challenge selection is based on personal preferences. Payouts once funded, are on a standard cycle and The Trading Pit offers educational support to set traders up for success. They are gaining popularity among European traders for their scaling options and access to multiple assets.
The Trading Pit
- Access to multiple assets: With access to forex, CFDs, and futures (varies by program)
- Profit split: Scaling and competitive profit splits of ~80%.
- Platforms: Proprietary tools, MT4, and MT5.
- Capital based on performance: Progressively higher funding.
- Community: Trader tools and resources to support sustained success.
The Trading Pit
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Multi-asset access: Forex, CFDs, futures. | Slower payout timing (up to 14 days). |
| Competitive profit splits (~80%). | Occasional platform slippage reported. |
| Scalable accounts based on performance. | Smaller community support. |
| Transparent evaluation rules. | Fewer educational resources than top competitors. |
| European-focused support for traders. | Limited demo account features. |
10. Topstep.
Based in Chicago, Topstep is a proprietary trading firm with a focus on futures. They use the Trading Combine evaluations, where traders must show a consistent profit and a responsible risk management to receive a funded account.

After they are funded profit splits are up to 90% with payout cycles on a daily, or bi weekly schedule. Futures marketplaces also include NinjaTrader and Quantower with Rithmic data.
They have had some history, but a few technical problems recently have impacted user experience.
Topstep
- Futures-oriented: Top choice in Chicago for futures traders.
- Profit split: 100% on initial small win. Followed by ~80-90% then.
- Available tools: NinjaTrader and Quantower with other similar tools.
- Examination: Trading Combine with multiple stages revolving around profit and risk managerial
- Payouts: Weekly and biweekly with structured bonuses.
Topstep
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent for futures trading (Trading Combine). | Limited to futures only; no forex or crypto. |
| Structured evaluation encourages proper risk management. | Monthly fees can be high for beginners. |
| Profit split: 100% on first small profits, then ~80–90%. | Platform outages occasionally reported. |
| Strong coaching and community support. | Evaluation may take longer due to multiple stages. |
| Multiple platform options: NinjaTrader, Quantower. | Not ideal for EU forex/CFD traders. |
Key Criteria for Choosing a Prop Firm in Europe
Regulation & Trustworthiness – Safety and compliance with European law is posible by selecting prop firms that are properly licensed, are transparent, and have a verifiable history of payouts.
Profit Split – Each trader has unique earning potentials, and most Trading prop firms have scales which can be generated credited splits as accounts are traded.
Challenge Rules – Consider your own style and associated risks. What draws me in is the prospect of breaking the target when considering pushes profit.
Platforms & Tools – Smooth execution relies on MT4, MT5, and cTrader, but the other platforms and tools are also reliable with trading APIs and analytics.
Funding & Scaling Options – Does the firm offer scaling as your performance increases? What are the growth limits? Where does account size max out?
Payout Speed & Frequency – Trust and cash flow depend on transparent payouts as well as weekly or bi-valent.
Asset Coverage – Forex, crypto, CFDs, indices, commodities, futures, and other instruments can be assessed by the firm.
Fees & Costs – Challenge fees, hidden fees, and subscription fees contribute to your total costs. What are the total costs? Are they worth the potential profits?
Trader Support & Community – Active trading communities, mentorship programs, and responsive customer service speed up learning and help overcome challenges.
Flexibility & Risk Management – Consider companies that offer trading flexibility, reasonable drawdown policies, adjustable leverage, and support your individual trading plans.
Tips for European Traders in 2026
Choose Reputable Prop Firms: Trade only with regulated companies, with clear earning and losing policies and an established European presence for trust and security.
Understand Challenge Rules: Profit targets, drawdowns, and time limits may result in failure, so choose a company that fits your trading style.
Start Small and Scale: Learning to manage risks starts with small accounts, and gradually increases in size as your results and confidence build.
Use Reliable Trading Platforms: Industry standards create reliability. Platforms like MT 4 and 5, and NinjaTrader lend optimal trading conditions.
Focus on Risk Management: Position sizes, leverage, and daily losses should all have limits so that a drawdown is avoided, and the loss is controlled.
Diversify Instruments: To avoid being affected by the movements of a single market, trade in multiple, including Forex, commodities, indices, and futures.
Track Performance and Journal Trades: Recording your trades, strategies, and errors will identify the gaps in your trading and give you the a blue print for improvement.
Leverage Community and Mentorship: Use the relationships built in trades to form communities, as well as mentorships, and share the strategies of the experienced traders.
An Emphasis on the Importance of Payout Speed – Choose companies that allow for fast and dependable withdrawal requests so that you can better manage your cash flow and not stress about slow payment cycles.
Keep Abreast of the Rules – Observe European Union financial laws, tax obligations, and leverage regulations to remain compliant and avoid fines.
Conclusion
European traders in 2026 can choose from many good prop firms also with varied funding methods, platforms, and profit sharing models. FTMO, FundedNext, and The5%ers are reputable prop firms with great evaluative moats and scalable capital, while newer prop firms like BrightFunded and E8 Markets possess strong tech and good payout speed.
Different prop firms suit different traders. Evaluative moats from challenge models, trustworthy profit splits, and high payout are the best factors prop traders can place in 2026 for high potential, consistent, professional growth in trading.
FAQ
A proprietary (prop) trading firm provides capital to traders to trade financial markets. Traders keep a portion of profits while risk is shared under firm rules.
Top choices include FTMO, FundedNext, The5%ers, Alpha Capital, E8 Markets, Funding Pips, BrightFunded, CTI, The Trading Pit, and Topstep, offering reliable funding, platforms, and payouts.
Profit splits usually range from 70% to 100%, depending on the firm and account type. Higher splits often come with scaling programs or advanced performance tiers.
Most use challenge or evaluation accounts, requiring traders to reach profit targets while adhering to max/daily drawdowns. Methods vary: one-step, two-step, or instant funding models.
Common platforms include MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, NinjaTrader, and MatchTrader. Some firms also offer proprietary dashboards or API access for advanced traders.










Got a Questions?
Find us on Socials or Contact us and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.