Why FundingPips Is Not a Good Prop Firm for Traders

I’ll go over why FundingPips isn’t a good prop firm for traders in this post. Although FundingPips provides funded accounts and large profit splits, it is a difficult option due to its stringent trading regulations, expensive assessment fees, restricted strategy flexibility, and uneven assistance. Before making a commitment, traders should carefully weigh these aspects to prevent stress, financial loss, and lost trading chances.

What Is FundingPips?

FundingPips is a proprietary firm that has built a reputation as a firm that helps traders trade big amounts of capital without sweating their own cash. Traders sign up for a challenge or assessment. After that they get funded with real capital to trade with.

Traders keep 80-100% of the profits. FundingPips has accounts of $100k to $300k and they can even scale up the funded amount. Traders can choose between MT5, cTrader or Match-Trader. FundingPips has a global reach and they focus on fast payouts, no strict time limits on evaluations, and transparency.

They designed their programs for beginner traders and experienced traders alike. Reviews highlight user-friendly dashboards, fast payouts, and clear communication. FundingPips supports MT5, cTrader and Match-Trader.

Why FundingPips Is Not a Good Prop Firm for Traders

Tight Trading Restrictions

FundingPips has firm drawdown limits, daily loss limits, and position size limits that can lead to forced closes. This can increase stress for traders.

Evaluation Fees

Traders have to pay fees to evaluate or challenge phases, which can add up if multiple attempts are necessary.

Challenging Profit Targets

Users have cited the profit targets as a challenge relative to the risk requirements combined with prevailing market conditions.

Strategy Restrictions

You may be penalized or not allowed to use certain techniques or styles, such as high-speed scalping, hedging, or some automated systems.

Execution Issues

Traders have reported issues with delay, slippage, and requoting on the platform. This is especially harmful in a fast market.

Withdrawal Conditions

Traders have qualified for funding, but have obstacles to withdrawals that impact their ability to freely manage their cash flow.

Lack of Transparency on Policies

Traders are forced to deal with changes in rules that are outlined imprecisely or are updated with little fanfare.

Limited Customer Support

Traders are left without assistance and may be unreachable when time is of the essence, especially in major issues.

Competitive Alternatives

Other proprietary firms can provide cheaper costs, more flexible policies, quicker payment processes, or higher transparency, which can be more enticing.

Stressful for New Traders

The combination of pressure from evaluations and strict guidelines can be especially frustrating for new traders.

Evaluation Rules and Trading Restrictions

Rule / Restriction	What It Means for Traders
Daily Drawdown Limit	You must not lose more than a set amount in a single day, or you fail the challenge—even if overall profitability is positive.
Maximum Drawdown Limit	A strict cap on total losses limits how much you can fluctuate, reducing flexibility during volatile markets.
Profit Target Requirements	You must reach specific profit targets within the challenge, which can be difficult under tight risk rules.
Position Size Limits	Restrictions on minimum or maximum lot sizes can limit certain trading strategies.
News and Event Trading Rules	Trading around major news or economic events may be restricted, forcing traders to miss opportunities.
Time Restrictions (if any)	Some evaluation plans impose time limits to reach targets, adding pressure and urgency.
Strategy Restrictions	Certain approaches like scalping, hedging, or expert advisors (EAs) may be limited or prohibited.
Overnight / Weekend Rules	Special rules for holding positions overnight or over weekends may increase risk of disqualification.
Trade Frequency Limits	Limits on how often you can open or close trades may restrict active trading styles.
Account Reset Conditions	Breaking rules often results in automatic challenge failure, requiring a new paid attempt.

Risks for New and Experienced Traders

Psychological Pressure

Emotional issues and stress from harsh limits and profit deadlines leads to poor trade decisions.

Available Capital (Evaluation Fees)

New traders may wind up losing a lot of money from various challenge fees before ever winning a funded account.

Rule Enforcement Risk

Disqualification, with no refunds, can happen for mere violations such as trade size and news trading, even if trading was successful.

Inflexible Risk Management

High levels of restriction on daily loss and drawdown limits can create risk that is contrary to a trader’s style.

Increasing Loss Potential

Some traders may even take excessive trading because they need to profit in order to reach a target.

Trade Loss Reducing Factors

Adverse market moves, requote, and slow trading platforms can adversely affect a long losing streak.

Clients’ Payments and Other Issues

Payment delays, minimum withdrawal restrictions, frequency limits, and other trade-related issues can adversely impact clients’ cash flows.

False Sense of Security

Some traders think that funding is less risky as long as they trade with rules to avoid disqualification.

Restricted Adaptability in Strategies

Some strategies (like, high-frequency trading, hedging) may be capped, restricting a trader’s power.

Success Isn’t Guaranteed with Experience

Even skilled traders can fall short due to the proprietary firm rules, the difficult pressures, and the time and money losses.

Payout Structure and Profit Split Concerns

Payout & Profit Split Aspect	Concerns for Traders
Profit Split Percentage	While high splits are advertised, actual take‑home amounts can be lower after fees or conditional requirements.
Payout Frequency	Weekly or bi‑weekly payouts may be delayed due to processing issues or verification requirements.
Minimum Withdrawal Thresholds	Minimum amounts required before payouts can be processed may slow access to profits.
Profit Holdback Conditions	Some profits may be held until specific conditions are met, limiting cash access.
Processing Time	Slow internal review or payout processing can delay funds arriving in trader accounts.
Profit Calculation Rules	Complexity or lack of clarity in how profits are calculated (e.g., net vs. gross) can reduce transparency.
Fee Deductions	Hidden or unclear fees (e.g., for swaps, transfers, or support) can reduce actual payouts.
Payout Methods	Limited payout options or slow payment methods can inconvenience traders.
Scaling Impact	Some traders find that scaling plans or higher account tiers change payout terms unfavorably.
Conditional Unlocks	Profit splits or payouts sometimes depend on additional criteria (e.g., activity, consistency), which can be restrictive.

High Challenge and Evaluation Costs

Non Refundable Upfront Fees

Before getting access to capital, traders are charged upfront evaluation fees and those fees are non refundable even if the challenge is not completed.

Cover Repeat Costs for Multiple Attempts

When traders fail an evaluation, they have to pay the fee to have a second shot, and that can add up to an unfathomable amount of money for traders.

Policies on Refund and Retry are Limited

Some funding firms do offer policies such as partial refunds with retake fees that are discounted. From this perspective, FundingPips premiums do seem a bit unfriendly to the trader.

Success Probability Versus Cost

For the novice trader, the outlay on repeat challenges is likely to be disproportionate to the chance of success.

Increased Fees for Larger Accounts

With larger accounts, there tends to be a disproportionately high evaluation fees, making access to bigger account sizes a greater financial challenge.

No Funding Fees Refund

Paid fees do not ensure guaranteed status— traders can risk a large amount of money and still not receive a financially backed account.

Pass Quickly and Funding Pressure

The pressure is funding based and due to the financial investment traders tend to hurries or even take shotgun risks to ensure that they are not wasting money.

Comparison Instead of Competitors with FundingPips

Compared to other prop firms, FundingPips are more expensive due to the facts that they are offering high evaluation costs, providing no refund methods, and not offering second chance attempts for free.

Additional Fees

Account extensions, customer support, and withdrawal requests are extra fees that could increase total costs.

Comparison With Better Prop Firm Alternatives

Prop Firm	Typical Entry Cost	Profit Split	Payout Frequency	Platforms	Evaluation Structure
FundingPips	Low–Moderate (often ~$29–$399)	Up to ~90–100%	Weekly/Bi-Weekly	MT5, cTrader, MatchTrader	1-step/2-step/Instant
FTMO	Moderate (~€540+)	~80–90%	~14–30 days	MT4/MT5, cTrader, DXTrade	Two-phase challenge (Challenge + Verification)
The5ers	Moderate (~$22+ depending on plan)	50–100%	Bi-weekly	MT5, cTrader	1–3 step evaluation & growth plans
FundedNext	Similar or slightly higher than FundingPips	~60–95%	On-demand / Bi-weekly	MT4/MT5, cTrader, Match	Instant or step challenges
FXIFY / Other Firms	~$39+	~80–100%	Bi-weekly	MT4/MT5, TradingView	1–3 step structure, broader asset access

Customer Support and Community Feedback

Since traders engage with a variety of brokers and other service providers, many have identified proper customer service and community relations as an area of improvement for FundingPips. Some traders say that, when it comes to verification of account issues, clarifications of rules, or technical issues during live trade, their response times are insufficient.

The longer they spend without an answer, the more disputes they have, and the more they misunderstand the policies, the more they are confused. In many online trading circles, the feedback is generally split.

Some appreciate the responsiveness of their channels, some appreciate the ease of Getting Funding Pips support while others have had to traverse the trade desk many times before an answer is given to a seemingly unsolvable question. For customers the support they need is ambiguous. New traders, more so than others, rely on consistent and detailed support.

Pros and Cons

Pros	Cons
Accessible entry levels for new traders	Strict drawdown and risk rules
Multiple account sizes available	Evaluation fees are non‑refundable
Profit splits that can be high for some plans	Challenging profit targets for many traders
Supports popular platforms (MT5, cTrader, etc.)	Limited strategy flexibility (scalping/hedging restrictions)
Fast payout options (weekly/bi‑weekly)	Payout conditions and delays reported by some users
Simple and transparent dashboard	Customer support can be slow or inconsistent
No strict time limits on some challenges	Mixed community feedback
Option for instant or multi‑step challenges	Costs can add up with repeated attempts

Conclusion

Despite providing traders with funded accounts, a variety of platforms, and potentially large profit splits, FundingPips is deficient in a number of crucial areas. Particularly for novice traders, strict trading regulations, expensive assessment fees, and difficult profit goals put them under financial and psychological strain.

Its limited strategy flexibility, payout delays, and inconsistent customer service further diminish its appeal. FundingPips is a less desirable option for traders looking for a steady and encouraging financing environment because it lacks transparency, dependability, and cost-effectiveness when compared to other prop firms like FTMO or The5ers.

FAQ