Transparency In Our DNA

DOCUMENT PFL-TRANSPARENCY-01 · LAST REVISED [PLACEHOLDER: 25 JUN 2026]
ACTIVELY MAINTAINED

What feeds our rankings — and what we keep off the record.

This page is PropFirmLion's public disclosure register: a line-by-line account of what goes into our reviews, scores, and payout tracking — and an honest list of what we don't publish, and why. No firm pays for placement on this register.

NOTE —

A commercial relationship with PropFirmLion (advertising, sponsorship, or affiliate terms) never determines ranking position, review outcome, or trust status. Sponsored content is always labeled separately from independent coverage. [PLACEHOLDER: confirm exact disclosure wording with legal before publishing]

Four rules our process can't break.

Everything below — rankings, reviews, the payout tracker — answers to these four lines. If a future feature can't satisfy all four, we don't ship it.

01

Placement isn't for sale.

No firm can buy a ranking position, a star rating, or a "verified" badge. Advertising and listing fees fund the platform — they don't touch the scoring logic.

02

Scores come from measurable inputs.

Rankings are informed by trader activity, submitted reviews, payout-related evidence, and platform usage data — not by our editorial opinion of a firm's "vibe."

03

We separate evidence from claims.

A firm telling us it pays out fast isn't the same as our tracker showing it. We weight verified, traceable evidence above self-reported marketing claims.

04

Disclosure has a floor, not a ceiling.

We publish our reasoning and inputs by default. We withhold specific mechanics only where publishing them would let bad actors reverse-engineer the system — see Section 03.

Every input to our scoring, stamped by status.

This is the actual register — every category of input we use, and whether we publish it in full, publish it partially, or keep it private. Nothing in this list is summarized away.

DISCLOSED — published in full, methodology and source included PARTIAL — logic published, raw inputs withheld WITHHELD — not published, see Section 03 for why

Ranking Inputs

REG / RANK-01–05
Trader review volume & recency
How many reviews a firm has, weighted toward recent activity
Disclosed
RANK-01
Verified payout evidence
Cross-referenced against our payout tracker, not self-reported figures
Disclosed
RANK-02
Rule-clarity scoring
Whether a firm's published rules are unambiguous and consistently enforced
Partial
RANK-03
Category weighting (exact %)
The precise weight each input above carries in the final score
Withheld
RANK-04
Anti-manipulation filters
Detection logic for review brigading, fake payout claims, and vote manipulation
Withheld
RANK-05

Review Pipeline

REG / REV-01–04
Verification requirements
What a trader must show to be marked "verified funded" or "verified paid out"
Disclosed
REV-01
Moderation & takedown criteria
Why a review gets removed — defamatory, unverifiable, or against guidelines
Disclosed
REV-02
Right-of-reply process for firms
How a firm can respond to a negative review with evidence
Disclosed
REV-03
Fraud-detection thresholds
The specific signals that flag a review cluster as inorganic
Withheld
REV-04

Commercial Relationships

REG / COM-01–03
Which firms have a paid relationship with us
Disclosed on every relevant page via a labeled sponsorship marker
Disclosed
COM-01
Affiliate & referral terms by firm
Whether we earn a fee if a reader signs up through our link
Disclosed
COM-02
Exact commercial terms (rates, contract length)
Standard confidentiality between PropFirmLion and each partner firm
Withheld
COM-03

Why some rows say "withheld" instead of just publishing everything: a handful of inputs — exact scoring weights and fraud-detection thresholds, mainly — are the same kind of detail a spam operation would use to game the system if we handed it over. We'd rather explain our reasoning honestly and protect the register's integrity than publish a blueprint for manipulating it. Every other input defaults to open.

How we measure payouts without trusting firms' own numbers.

The payout tracker exists because marketing claims and actual payout behavior aren't always the same thing. Here's what feeds it and what doesn't.

Source of Record

What counts as a tracked payout

A payout enters the tracker only when a trader submits verifiable evidence — a payout confirmation, transaction reference, or statement — that we can cross-check. [PLACEHOLDER: confirm exact verification artifacts accepted]

What We Calculate

Metrics shown per firm

Total tracked payouts, payout count, largest single payout, average payout size, and median time-to-payout — each recalculated as new evidence comes in, not fixed at submission.

What We Exclude

Claims that don't make the tracker

Firm press releases, unverified social posts, and screenshots without a checkable reference number are excluded — they may be real, but we don't have a way to confirm them yet.

Known Limitation

What this number can't tell you

The tracker reflects payouts traders chose to report to us, not every payout a firm has ever made. A lower count can mean fewer payouts, or just fewer reports — read it alongside reviews and rules, not alone.

Firms tracked
[PLACEHOLDER: 60+]
Verified payout records
[PLACEHOLDER: 10,500+]
Median verification time
[PLACEHOLDER: 3–5 days]
Tracker last recalculated
[PLACEHOLDER: weekly]

What a high rank means — and what it explicitly doesn't.

A high rank does mean

The firm scores well across our disclosed, evidence-based inputs as of the last recalculation.
Its rules and policies were reviewed and are publicly verifiable on its own site or dashboard.
It has tracked payout history we could independently cross-check.
Reader reviews about it have passed our fraud and brigading filters.

A high rank does not mean

A guarantee of solvency, future business stability, or that every future payout will be honored.
Certification, endorsement, or a warranty of conduct from PropFirmLion.
That the firm has no commercial relationship with us — check the labeled disclosure on its listing.
That trading with any firm, regardless of rank, is without financial risk.

What happens before a firm appears on PropFirmLion at all.

STAGE 01

Eligibility screen

We confirm the firm publishes its own rules, pricing, and payout terms publicly — firms that won't disclose basic terms on their own site don't proceed.

Pass / Reject
STAGE 02

Compliance & claims check

Marketing claims (payout speed, guarantees, profit splits) are checked against the firm's own published terms for consistency. [PLACEHOLDER: confirm internal compliance criteria]

Conditional listing
STAGE 03

Initial listing, unranked

The firm appears in our directory but doesn't enter ranked comparisons until it has enough independent trader activity to score.

Provisional
STAGE 04

Ongoing re-evaluation

Rankings recalculate on a fixed cycle and whenever a material rule change, payout pattern shift, or verified dispute is reported.

Continuous

Direct answers to what people actually ask us.

Q — Can a firm pay to fix a bad ranking?
No. Advertising spend has no path into the scoring logic. A firm with a commercial relationship with us can still rank low, and a firm with no relationship at all can rank high.
Q — Why won't you publish the exact scoring weights?
Publishing the precise formula would tell bad actors exactly how to game it — which review patterns to fake, which metrics to inflate. We publish the inputs and the logic; the precise weighting stays private for the same reason a spam filter doesn't publish its exact thresholds.
Q — A firm I trust isn't ranked highly. Is the data wrong?
Possibly, and we want to know if so. More often, it reflects fewer verified reviews or less tracked payout history than a competitor — not necessarily worse conduct. Check the firm's individual disclosure markers on its listing page for specifics.
Q — What happens if a firm disputes a review or ranking?
Firms can submit evidence through our right-of-reply process (Section 02, REV-03). Disputes don't pause the listing, but resolved disputes with verified evidence can adjust the score at the next recalculation.

Every material change to this page, dated.

This is a living document. Material changes to scope, methodology, or disclosure status are logged here — not edited away silently.

Date
Change Type
Description
[PLACEHOLDER
25 JUN 2026]
Initial
First public release of the Transparency & Disclosure Register, covering ranking inputs, review pipeline, payout methodology, and vetting pipeline.
[PLACEHOLDER
—]
Added
[PLACEHOLDER] Example future entry — e.g. "Added Section 05 vetting pipeline detail after reader feedback requested more clarity on pre-listing checks."
[PLACEHOLDER
—]
Revised
[PLACEHOLDER] Example future entry — e.g. "Revised payout tracker methodology wording for clarity; no change to underlying calculation."

Use the register, the tracker, and the reviews together — not any one alone.